Open Sourcing Free Energy Technology



Uploaded by: lockergnome
Video Description:
http://live.pirillo.com - Sterling D. Allan, CEO of Pure Energy Systems Network, and founder of the New Energy Congress, gives the captone presentation on Aug. 11, 2007 at the Gnomedex conference in Seattle. He speaks about the process of screening for the best clean energy technologies, and suggests the open source approach for breaking the logjam on some of the more revolutionary technologies. He defines "free energy" as referring to energy modalities that harness energy that does not have to be paid for, including conventional methods such as solar, wind, geothermal, and tide; as well as the exotic approaches, including cold fusion, zero point energy, and magnet motors. He expects that some of these more exotic forms could bring the price of energy down several-fold, while also being clean and renewable. He recommends the open source method for quickly disseminating the technology once it is mature enough.


Tags for this video: allan alternative energy freeenergy gnomelocker lockergnome pirillo pure renewable sterlingallan tech tv video

Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by lockergnome

Related Videos
The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (part 1 of 8)Free Energy - Selfrunning Bedini Motor ReplicationThe Venus Project - Free Energy
the-most-important-video-youll-ever-see-part-1-of-8.htmlthe-most-important-video-youll-ever-see-part-1-of-8.htmlthe-most-important-video-youll-ever-see-part-1-of-8.html
free energy elemental rod generator video 1Joe Cell Free Energy PhenomenaWelcom to New Technology
the-most-important-video-youll-ever-see-part-1-of-8.htmlthe-most-important-video-youll-ever-see-part-1-of-8.htmlthe-most-important-video-youll-ever-see-part-1-of-8.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
either ur a disinfo ... ( 2 months ago by bubbi316)
either ur a disinfo or a retard and just to prove my point u keep paying ur power bill this tech was available 60 years ago
I talk to this guy ... ( 2 months ago by TommeyLeeReed)
I talk to this guy about my patented rotary piston engine, he into his own world.
The fact he try to talk about a magnet motor that did not work.
This guy is full of ... ( 2 months ago by TommeyLeeReed)
This guy is full of crap. I talked to this guy about my motor, he told me to start a web page on my technology. he would not even give my patented rotary piston engine a chance. He did not even look at it!
BS, is all this guy is for.
To bring in money for there own goals...
i like the idea of ... ( 2 months ago by goalkick36)
i like the idea of open source. I like the idea of not making a profit because i think profit is just a artificial way of feeling successful, but his approach to this seems like a scam, "a inventor could make money by creating a pdf with every information and selling it for 30 bucks", that is a stretch to get someone's idea. Not the best approach and i dont like it.
I'm sorry you feel ... ( 2 months ago by m3141592)
I'm sorry you feel that way. Please ask an adult you trust who knows about science what they think of it, and they'll probably tell you it's an essentially meaningless marketing exercise to drum up funding.
Real free energy on ... ( 2 months ago by TommeyLeeReed)
Real free energy on my you tube videos
I will be willing ... ( 1 month ago by TommeyLeeReed)
I will be willing to take only $100,000.00 for a proto type rotary piston engine.
US patent # 6,860,251.
Most efficient engine ever!
a patent cost you ... ( 1 month ago by vietarc)
a patent cost you $3000-20000 . If you work for a company, any invention idea you have belong to the company. Even if you get your patent, big company still can bend the law and file lawsuit on you. Wth is this world coming to. Anyone care about humanity anymore?
Has no clue what's ... ( 4 weeks ago by LowellGarrett)
Has no clue what's going on behind the scenes in the free energy field
Where are you ... ( 3 weeks ago by TommeyLeeReed)
Where are you getting a patent for $3000?
It cost me around $6500 and I do all my own drawings.
I am working on another patent and attorney's fees are about $5000.
Free advice for any ... ( 3 weeks ago by ecomafia)
Free advice for any potential investors....
Now if this dude claims money for anything like perpetual motion, magnet motors or other device in contradiction with thermodynamics, then kick his bottom. They are THOUSANDS OF SUCH HOAXES. In fact, blackholes for money.
Fusion defies ... ( 3 weeks ago by cheshire03)
Fusion defies thermodynamics and it's a multi-billion dollar undertaking by many countires, scientist, and engineers accross the world. They claim that a fully working fusion reactor could produce as much as 1000 times more energy then what the machine requires to operate. That's a direct violation of the laws of thermodynamics, yet whole countries are putting forth a huge amount of resources to get a fully functional reactor. The laws of thermodynamics are probably if you consider that.
Array ( 3 weeks ago by ecomafia)
Wel Cheshire,
Face it, fusion defies thermodynamics ONLY in HOAX cases. It doesn't in tokamaks or other "hot fusion" experiments.
Listen to this dude. His talk is a far cry from science. And it takes quite a lot of scientific knowledge to master the subject.
I've also seen that dude spinning some magnet bearing contraption claiming it to be a permanent motor.
Nope, keep your cash away from there.
Is a hoax and fraud.
There is real ... ( 3 weeks ago by cheshire03)
There is real science in Fusion, it's the way our sun works and the reason it's still lighting our sky, otherwise it would have ran out of fuel a long time ago. Scientist and engineers (even the ones from Tokamak) are the ones saying that a fully functioning fusion reactor that can sustain fusion would output many many times more energy then what is consumed (up to 1000 times more). They're only trying to replicate something that already exists in nature. Are we to call them hoaxers and frauds?
Array ( 3 weeks ago by ecomafia)
Chesh,
Fusion research is a serious matter indeed.
Thst dude is a far cry from anything scientific. I've seen him argue in favor of magnetic motors.
Here he sells shares of something he'll never achieve nor has intentions to.
I showed that vid to my lawyer.
Under Swiss laws, I could make lotsa money.
Just sue him for "incitation to fraudulent investment". In court, ask him to show any real scientifically correct work. He can't. Easy off.
DO not plz mix real scientists with frauds.
I'm not disputing ... ( 3 weeks ago by cheshire03)
I'm not disputing if this guy is a hoaxer, because he may very well be. All I'm arguing is that fusion is something that defies thermodynamics. There is real science proving this, and because of that we can't readily dismiss the idea that no machine could ever do so. Our science continues to grow and we learn new things all the time. To reject something like fusion is to reject our sun, all stars, and even life here on earth. Obviously the laws of thermodynamics need to be re-written.
Fusion is a *very* ... ( 3 weeks ago by ecomafia)
Fusion is a *very* controversal subject especially outside of sun's temperature ranges.
Should it happen, then, it'll not defy any of thermodynamics because as in fission, mass and energy are related.
Not everyone achieves fusion when stating so.
It hsppens in hi energy physics labs with a mediocre efficiency. The way is long and folks with serious theory approach have their chances.
Frauds as well.
One UNKNOWN case remains Joseph Papp. Feynman could not debunk it 100% I'm puzzled.
Then why does ... ( 3 weeks ago by cheshire03)
Then why does fusion defy the the most important things about thermodynamics? That is that the output energy of any machine can not exceed the energy put in? Yet a fully functional fusion reactor would do that very thing to a degree that seems impossible. I have faith that one day, humanity will create such a machine. Come to think of it, a fully functinal commercial ready fusion reactor is already in the building stages and is expected to be operational in the next decade.
Well Chesh, friend, ... ( 3 weeks ago by ecomafia)
Well Chesh, friend,
You're positively minded, so here's a bit of enlightement on how things work.
To fuse nuclei, take 2 hydrogens, one needs to overcome the "strong force".
Done in tokamaks, nuke blasts and the sun.
All HIGH PRESSURE HIGH ENERGY devices, i.e. very HOT.
None defies energy conservation from relativistic point of view. Mass turns to energy.
Cold fusion is not here yet, at least in a repetitive way.
And hot fusion is "a little too hot".
This is not a "garage project".
The speaker is a ... ( 1 week ago by doobedoo22)
The speaker is a fraudster. He tries to make the bogus 'free energy' technologies sound legitimate by mentioning them at the same time as wind and wave power, efficiency and conservation. So: half the things he's talking about work. But he wants you to buy into the the other half. *sigh*
вот пидерасты уже ... ( 1 week ago by kakoinax)
вот пидерасты уже удалили вмдюшку...у кого есть пришлите пожалуйста
Before they thought ... ( 1 week ago by juansjovis)
Before they thought Columbus was nuts. The Earth was flat. It had been like this for thousands of years. The reality is whatever rules and laws you have in your head. Maybe you're just one of these many people, who didn't believe Columbus in his time. That was just 500 years ago. Have we suddenly become all-knowing, or are we just arrogant and afraid? We're still the same.
thanks for putting ... ( 1 week ago by paraipanakos)
thanks for putting this out man, you rock
doobedoo22 ( 1 week ago by paraipanakos)
doobedoo22



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code